Police Profiling Essay Police Profiling Essay Profiling can broadly be defined as an investigative tool that helps predict the personal characteristics and motivations of an unknown offender. The category of profiling includes a variety of techniques and practices, such as analyzing the individual and geographic characteristics of crime scenes, which each contribute unique information to build a more comprehensive profile that assists investigators to narrow down a lengthy suspect list. Profiling can also be misused and critics question its applications as both unethical and inefficient. Individual Characteristics Creating a criminal profile or offender profile as it is known in Europe involves the analysis of crime scene evidence, both forensic and behavioral, to develop a psychological and physical description of the perpetrator.
But there is no place for racial profiling in law enforcement. I had spotted a reckless driver speeding through the streets of Van Nuys in a large pickup truck, so I flipped on my lights and took up the chase. The driver eventually pulled over, but as I walked up to his car, he began shouting at me, accusing me of having stopped him because he was black.
I could not sleep that night. A liberal academic before becoming a police officer, I had joined the Los Angeles Police Department hoping to make a difference. Yet here I was, on my first traffic stop, being accused Privacy versus profiling essay racism. I thought of that incident again last week, when the LAPD was accused yet again of not adequately guarding against racial profiling by its officers.
This time, it was the Department of Justice making the claim.
As evidence, the agency cited a recording of two officers seemingly endorsing the practice in a conversation with a supervisor. A perception that police target members of specific ethnic or racial groups creates a deep divide between the police and the communities we serve.
True racial profiling, in which people are targeted solely because of race or ethnicity, is both illegal and immoral. It destroys public trust and reduces the effectiveness of the police. There is no place for it in law enforcement. Consider the gang officers in Foothill Division, where I work.
Each day, they go out in the field looking for Latino males of a certain age who dress in a particular way, have certain tattoos on their bodies and live in an area where street gangs flourish. Does that mean they are engaging in racial profiling?
They are using crime data to identify possible suspects. Ethnicity is just one of many criteria they consider. We have to acknowledge that there is a place for race and ethnicity in police work.
If officers get information that a 6-foot-tall Asian man with a Fu Manchu mustache committed a robbery, they are of course going to target their search to tall Asian men with Fu Manchu mustaches.
Officers are trained to use all the data available to them in apprehending criminals.
When officers follow leads and stop people, they do use profiling, but it is profiling based on all actionable intelligence, which includes race as one of many criteria. I suspect the officer whose comment was caught on tape was talking about this kind of criminal profiling. I am not naive enough to believe that pure racial profiling has never happened.
But in my experience, Los Angeles police officers are much less likely than the general public to act on personal prejudices and biases. The LAPD has come a long way and has made concerted efforts to transform itself into a community-policing-based agency.
But the perceptions of some Angelenos are still rooted in memories of a time when minority members were frequently abused and ill-treated by police officers. For more than a decade, there has been a push to put video cameras in all patrol cars to record officer interactions with those they stop.
There have been technical difficulties and problems with cost. But ultimately this is a crucial step to take to reduce community perceptions of racial profiling. We should also equip offices with personal video cams.
Recording every police-citizen interaction would not only keep officers professional, it would greatly increase the conviction rate of criminals, reduce expenses of the criminal justice system and build trust in police-public relations. The majority of hardworking and professional officers would benefit tremendously.
All the false allegations made against them could be instantly dismissed, and complaint investigations would be much quicker and less costly. Additionally, the criminal justice system would save on investigative costs when a video recording demonstrated clearly that officers had a probable cause and obtained evidence properly.
This could lead to more criminals pleading guilty, saving us long and costly court proceedings. Many savvy officers have already started using cop-cams, purchasing them with their own funds. These officers realize the protection video recordings provide against false complaints.
It is time for the department to institutionalize video recordings. The opinions expressed are his own.On the one hand, our right to privacy will ensure that our personal rights are not violated, whereas, on the other hand, national security would allow us some comfort against the evil in the world.
Table of Contents. Vic Biorseth, Tuesday, July 30, srmvision.com This webpage was inspired by comments from John of Escondido, California, whose motivating comments can be seen after the Of Lies and Liars webpage. John recommended an "executive summary" of each webpage, which seemed at first to present a daunting task.
GENETIC TESTING, PRIVACY AND DISCRIMINATION. The concept of "genetic discrimination" only recently entered our vocabulary. But the problem is well documented. Indeed, the Council for Responsible Genetics was the first organization to compile documented cases of genetic discrimination, laying the intellectual groundwork for .
Nov 22, · Racial profiling has consistently been one of the most confounding, divisive and controversial issues the police department confronts. A perception that police target members of specific ethnic or racial groups creates a deep divide between the police and the communities we serve.
Let’s start with the philosophical fundamentals. Limiting civil liberties and the right to privacy in the name of defending a liberal democratic nation is the ultimate hypocrisy. We've been told we have to trade off security and privacy so often -- in debates on security versus privacy, writing contests, polls, reasoned essays and political rhetoric -- that most of us don't even question the fundamental dichotomy.